索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]诸灵祺,赵少坚,谢黎,等.股骨假体周围骨折研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2023,05:269-273.
点击复制

股骨假体周围骨折研究进展(PDF)

《国际骨科学杂志》[ISSN:1673-7083/CN:31-1952/R]

期数:
2023年05期
页码:
269-273
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2023-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
诸灵祺; 赵少坚; 谢黎; 谢威; 翟文亮
361102， 厦门大学医学院（诸灵祺）； 363000 福建漳州，联勤保障部队第九〇九医院（厦门大学附属东南医院）骨科（ 全军骨科中心）（诸灵祺、赵少坚、谢黎、谢威、翟文亮）
Author(s):
-
关键词:
股骨假体周围骨折; Vancouver 分型; 治疗
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn. 1673-7083.2023.05.001
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
股骨假体周围骨折是全髋关节置换术的严重并发症，Vancouver 分型是指导股骨假体周围骨折临床治疗最 常用的分型。股骨假体周围骨折的处理需要考虑骨折、假体、骨量、患者情况以及医师经验等。该文从股骨假体周围 骨折的流行病学入手，分析导致骨折的危险因素，通过Vancouver 分型探讨其治疗原则及常用方法，以期对股骨假体 周围骨折的诊疗有所帮助。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

[1] Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(Suppl 2): S66-S70.
[2] Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT, et al. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience[J]. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98B(4): 461-467.
[3] Lindahl H. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty[J]. Injury, 2007, 38(6): 651-654.
[4] Zheng H, Gu H, Shao H, et al. Treatment and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102B(3): 293-300.
[5] Fenelon C, Murphy EP, Kearns SR, et al. A growing challenge: the rise of femoral periprosthetic fractures: an 11-year observational study[J]. Surgeon, 2020, 18(1): 19-23.
[6] Springer BD, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(11): 2156- 2162.
[7] Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2005, 20(7): 857-865.
[8] Zhang Z, Zhuo Q, Chai W, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(35): e4751.
[9] Konow T, Baetz J, Melsheimer O, et al. Factors influencing periprosthetic femoral fracture risk[J]. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103B(4): 650-658.
[10] Hoskins W, Bingham R, Lorimer M, et al. Early rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty related to surgical approach: an analysis of 122,345 primary total hip arthroplasties[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2020, 102(21): 1874-1882.
[11] Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Peng Y, et al. The effect of surgical approach and femoral prosthesis type on revision rates following total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the most commonly utilized cementless stems[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2022, 104(1): 24-32.
[12] Jeschke E, Citak M, Günster C, et al. Obesity increases the risk of postoperative complications and revision rates following primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 131,576 total hip arthroplasty cases[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(7): 2287-2292.e1.
[13] Brüggemann H, Dalen I, Bache-Mathiesen LK, et al. Incidence and risk factors of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures during primary total hip arthroplasty: 218,423 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1987 and 2020[J]. Acta Orthop, 2022, 93: 405-412.
[14] Ramavath A, Lamb JN, Palan J, et al. Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture around total hip replacements: current concepts and clinical outcomes[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2020, 5(9): 558-567.
[15] Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, et al. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2000, 15(1): 59-62.
[16] Yi PH, Della Valle CJ, Fishman EK, et al. Imaging of periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee[J]. Semin Roentgenol, 2021, 56(1): 90- 105.
[17] Parrish TF, Jones JR. Fracture of the femur following prosthetic arthroplasty of the hip. Report of nine cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1964, 46: 241-248.
[18] Johansson JE, McBroom R, Barrington TW, et al. Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1981, 63(9): 1435-1442.
[19] Bethea JS 3rd, DeAndrade JR, Fleming LL, et al. Proximal femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1982, 170: 95-106.
[20] Duncan CP, Haddad FS. The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96B(6): 713-716.
[21] Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2008, 90(12): 1576-1579.
[22] Bates BD, Walmsley DW, Vicente MR, et al. An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(2): 364-369.
[23] Pritchett JW. Fracture of the greater trochanter after hip replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001, 390: 221-226.
[24] 刘海昌, 刘刚. 髋关节置换术后大转子骨折的治疗[J]. 中华医学 杂志, 2012, 92(19): 1349-1351.
[25] Misur PN, Duncan CP, Masri BA. The treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: a critical analysis review[J]. JBJS Rev, 2014, 2(8): e3.
[26] Zarin JS, Zurakowski D, Burke DW. Claw plate fixation of the greater trochanter in revision total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2009, 24(2): 272-280.
[27] van Houwelingen AP, Duncan CP. The pseudo A(LT) periprosthetic fracture: it’s really a B2[J]. Orthopedics, 2011, 34(9): e479-e481.
[28] Moazen M, Leonidou A, Pagkalos J, et al. Application of far cortical locking technology in periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(8): 1849-1856.
[29] Demos HA, Briones MS, White PH, et al. A biomechanical comparison of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation in normal and osteoporotic cadaveric bone[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(5): 783-788.
[30] Lewis GS, Caroom CT, Wee H, et al. Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: a biomechanical study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(10): e364-e370.
[31] Sariyilmaz K, Dikici F, Dikmen G, et al. The effect of strut allograft and its position on Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: a biomechanical study[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(7): 1485-1490.
[32] Moore RE, Baldwin K, Austin MS, et al. A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(5): 872-876.
[33] Min BW, Cho CH, Son ES, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(7): 1336-1340.
[34] Lee YK, Kim JT, Kim KC, et al. Conservative treatment for minimally displaced type B periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(11): 3529-3532.
[35] Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA. The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements[J]. Injury, 2003, 34(2): 95- 105.
[36] Khan T, Grindlay D, Ollivere BJ, et al. A systematic review of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99B(Supple 4): S17-S25.
[37] Li D, Hu Q, Kang P, et al. Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft[J]. Int Orthop, 2018, 42(12): 2787-2795.
[38] Parry JA, Hernandez NM, Berry DJ, et al. Risk factors for subsidence of modular fluted tapered stems used during revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fractures[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(9): 2967-2970.
[39] Russell RD, Huo MH, Rodrigues DC, et al. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: a finite element study[J]. Technol Health Care, 2016, 24(6): 865-872.
[40] Parvizi J, Vegari DN. Periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: current concepts[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(Suppl 2): S77-S81.
[41] Viste A, Perry KI, Taunton MJ, et al. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99B(3): 325- 329.
[42] Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, K?rrholm J. Lower reoperation rate with locking plates compared with conventional plates in Vancouver type C periprosthetic femoral fractures: a register study of 639 cases in Sweden[J]. Injury, 2019, 50(12): 2292-2300.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家骨科与运动康复临床医学研究中心创新基金（2023-NCRC-CXJJ-ZC-01）、2022 年厦门大学附属东南医院自主科研项目基金（22ZD003）、福建省自然科学基金（2020J01135）
通信作者：翟文亮 E-mail ： wlzhai1971@xmu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-30