索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]金翔赟,涂志朋,张超,等.骨盆骨折合并出血性休克早期止血方法[J].国际骨科学杂志,2022,06:348-351.
点击复制

骨盆骨折合并出血性休克早期止血方法(PDF)

《国际骨科学杂志》[ISSN:1673-7083/CN:31-1952/R]

期数:
2022年06期
页码:
348-351
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2022-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
文章编号:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2022.06.006
作者:
金翔赟;涂志朋;张超;黄平;
200127, 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院创伤骨科 (金翔赟、张超、黄平);200127, 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院手术 室(涂志朋)
Author(s):
-
关键词:
骨盆骨折出血性休克止血手术治疗动脉栓塞
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
骨盆骨折合并出血性休克是目前创伤骨科医生面临的巨大挑战,其致死率非常高。早期积极采取止血措施 对于挽救生命具有重要意义。常用的止血方式包括骨盆稳定装置、腹膜外骨盆填塞、动脉栓塞、复苏性主动脉内球 囊阻断装置等。临床上根据骨盆骨折的严重程度和血流动力学稳定程度选择最佳的干预措施对预后具有决定性作用。 该文对骨盆骨折合并出血性休克的各种止血措施进行综述,并探讨其最佳的治疗流程。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

[1] Incagnoli P, Puidupin A, Ausset S, et al. Early management of severe pelvic injury (first 24 hours)[J]. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2019, 38(2): 199-207.
[2] Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, et al. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: results of an american association for the surgery of trauma multi-institutional trial[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2016, 80(5): 717-723.
[3] Jang JY, Bae KS, Chang SW, et al. Current management and clinical outcomes for patients with haemorrhagic shock due to pelvic fracture in Korean regional trauma centres: a multi-institutional trial[J]. Injury, 2022, 53(2): 488-495.
[4] Rungsinaporn V, Akkarawanit P, Kongmalai P. Benefits of early application of pelvic circumferential compression device to reduce bleeding in pelvic fractures[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 203.
[5] Magnone S, Coccolini F, Manfredi R, et al. Management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma: results of the first Italian consensus conference (cooperative guidelines of the Italian Society of Surgery, the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons, the Multispecialist Italian Society of Young Surgeons, the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma, the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine, the Italian Society of Medical Radiology -Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology- and the World Society of Emergency Surgery) [J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2014, 9(1): 18.
[6] H?ch A, Zeidler S, Pieroh P, et al. Trends and efficacy of external emergency stabilization of pelvic ring fractures: results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 47: 523-531.
[7] Schmal H, Larsen MS, Stuby F, et al. Effectiveness and complications of primary C-clamp stabilization or external fixation for unstable pelvic fractures[J]. Injury, 2019, 50(11): 1959-1965.
[8] Jang JY, Bae KS, Kang BH, et al. Comparison between external fixation and pelvic binder in patients with pelvic fracture and haemodynamic instability who underwent various haemostatic procedures[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 3664.
[9] Mikdad S, van Erp IAM, Moheb ME, et al. Pre-peritoneal pelvic packing for early hemorrhage control reduces mortality compared to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe blunt pelvic trauma patients: a nationwide analysis[J]. Injury, 2020, 51(8): 1834-1839.
[10] Lin SS, Zhou SG, He LS, et al. The effect of preperitoneal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2021, 24(2): 100-103.
[11] Burlew CC. Preperitoneal pelvic packing: a 2018 EAST Master Class Video Presentation[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 85(1): 224- 228.
[12] Sandhu J, Abrahams R, Miller Z, et al. Pelvic trauma: factors predicting arterial hemorrhage and the role of angiography and preperitoneal pelvic packing[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(11): 6376-6383.
[13] McDonogh JM, Lewis DP, Tarrant SM, et al. Preperitoneal packing versus angioembolization for the initial management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2022, 92(5): 931-939..
[14] Lustenberger T, St?rmann P, Eichler K, et al. Secondary angioembolization after emergent pelvic stabilization and pelvic packing is a safe option for patients with persistent hemorrhage from unstable pelvic ring injuries[J]. Front Surg, 2020, 7: 601140.
[15] Shim H, Jang JY, Kim JW, et al. Effectiveness and postoperative wound infection of preperitoneal pelvic packing in patients with hemodynamic instability caused by pelvic fracture[J]. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(11): e0206991.
[16] Heelan AA, Freedberg M, Moore EE, et al. Worth looking! venous thromboembolism in patients who undergo preperitoneal pelvic packing warrants screening duplex[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 220(6): 1395-1399.
[17] Mohseni S, Talving P, Kobayashi L, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography in detecting clinically significant arterial bleeding after pelvic fractures[J]. Am Surg, 2011, 77(9): 1176-1182.
[18] Verbeek DO, Ponsen KJ, van Delden OM, et al. The need for pelvic angiographic embolisation in stable pelvic fracture patients with a "blush" on computed tomography[J]. Injury, 2014, 45(12): 2111.
[19] Cieslak JA 3rd, Jazmati T, Patel A, et al. Trauma CT evaluation prior to selective angiography in patients with traumatic injuries: negative predictive power and factors affecting its utility[J]. Emerg Radiol, 2020, 27(5): 477-486.
[20] Nakajima K, Yamaguchi K, Abe T, et al. Extravasation and outcomes in CT and angiography in patients with pelvic fractures requiring transcatheter arterial embolization: a single-center observational study[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2021, 92(5): 873-879.
[21] Dreizin D, Bodanapally U, Boscak A, et al. CT prediction model for major arterial injury after blunt pelvic ring disruption[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(3): 1061-1069.
[22] Hundersmarck D, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, et al. Pelvic packing and angio-embolization after blunt pelvic trauma: a retrospective 18-year analysis[J]. Injury, 2021, 52(4): 946-955.
[23] Schwartz DA, Medina M, Cotton BA, et al. Are we delivering two standards of care for pelvic trauma? Availability of angioembolization after hours and on weekends increases time to therapeutic intervention[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2014, 76(1): 134-139.
[24] Matsushima K, Piccinini A, Schellenberg M, et al. Effect of door-toangioembolization time on mortality in pelvic fracture: every hour of delay counts[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 84(5): 685-692.
[25] Aoki M, Abe T, Matsumoto S, et al. Delayed embolization associated with increased mortality in pelvic fracture with hemodynamic stability at hospital arrival[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2021, 16(1): 21.
[26] Bonde A, Velmahos A, Kalva SP, et al. Bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic trauma: effectiveness and safety[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 220(2): 454-458.
[27] Hymel A, Asturias S, Zhao F, et al. Selective versus nonselective embolization versus no embolization in pelvic trauma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017, 83(3): 361-367.
[28] Doucet J, Coimbra R. REBOA: is it ready for prime time?[J]. J Vasc Bras, 2017, 16(1): 1-3.
[29] Joseph B, Zeeshan M, Sakran JV, et al. Nationwide analysis of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian trauma[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(6): 500-508.
[30] Taylor JR 3rd, Harvin JA, Martin C, et al. Vascular complications from resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: life over limb?[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2017, 83(1 Suppl 1): S120- S123.
[31] Matsumoto S, Funabiki T, Hayashida K, et al. Effectiveness and usage trends of hemorrhage control interventions in patients with pelvic fracture in shock[J]. World J Surg, 2020, 44(7): 2229-2236.
[32] Montmany Vioque S, Rebasa Cladera P, Campos Serra A, et al. Consequencies of therapeutic decision-making based on FAST results in trauma patients with pelvic fracture[J]. Cir Esp (Engl Ed), 2021, 99(6): 433-439.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目: 上海市科委2019 人工智能领域子课题(19511121305)
通信作者: 张超 E-mail :drzhangchao@sina.com 黄平 E-mail :wlpfw@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-01