索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李创,吴斌,郑启新.脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2020,06:342-346.
点击复制

脊髓型颈椎病手术治疗研究进展(PDF)

《国际骨科学杂志》[ISSN:1673-7083/CN:31-1952/R]

期数:
2020年06期
页码:
342-346
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2020-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
李创; 吴斌; 郑启新
武汉 430022, 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院骨科
Author(s):
-
关键词:
脊髓型颈椎病;  颈椎前路手术;  颈椎后路手术
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2020.06.005
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
脊髓型颈椎病可导致颈脊髓功能障碍,常需手术治疗。手术治疗方式分为前路手术、后路手术、前后路联合手术和微创手术。前路手术的优点在于可直接切除颈脊髓前方致压物,减压效果明显,植骨融合率高,可减少生理曲度丢失发生率; 缺点在于颈脊髓前方严重长节段压迫存在减压不充分的问题。后路手术适合多节段颈脊髓重度受压患者,属于间接减压,减压较为充分且安全; 缺点在于可引起颈后轴性痛、C5神经麻痹、颈脊髓神经损伤、颈椎生理曲度难以保持等并发症。颈脊髓前后同时严重压迫的患者通常需要行前后路联合手术。微创手术具有安全、有效、微创的优点,但适应证较严格,应用范围较小。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References

[1] Gibson J, Nouri A, Krueger B, et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a clinical review[J]. Yale J Biol Med, 2018, 91(1): 43-48.
[2] Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Cancienne JM, et al. Complication and reoperation rates following surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in Medicare beneficiaries[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(1): 1-7.
[3] Banno F, Zreik J, Alvi MA, et al. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: insights from a national registry[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 132: e852-e861.
[4] Katz AD, Mancini N, Karukonda T, et al. Comparative and predictor analysis of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity in patients undergoing multilevel ACDF versus single and multilevel ACCF using the ACS-NSQIP dataset[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2019, 44(23): E1379-E1387.
[5] Wang T, Wang H, Liu S, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2016, 95(49): e5437.
[6] Xiao S, Liang Z, Wei W, et al. Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(4): 975-984.
[7] Shen Y, Du W, Wang LF, et al. Comparison of zero-profile device versus plate and cage implant in the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2018, 115: e226-e232.
[8] Pandey PK, Pawar I, Gupta J, et al. Comparison of outcomes of single-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and single-level artificial cervical disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(1): E41-E49.
[9] Sheng B, Huang X, Sheng X, et al. Artificial cervical disk replacement for the treatment of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical decompression and fusion[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2017, 30(5): E587-E591.
[10] Zhao CM, Chen Q, Zhang Y, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus hybrid surgery in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2018, 97(34): e11973.
[11] Zhu Y, Fang J, Xu GH, et al. A hybrid technique for treating multilevel cervical myelopathy: cervical artificial disc replacement combined with fusion[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 17(1): 360-364.
[12] Sun J, Shi J, Xu X,et al. Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique[J]. Eur Spine J, 2018, 27(6): 1469-1478.
[13] Yang H, Sun J, Shi J, et al. Anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion as a choice for 28 patients of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with dura ossification: the risk of cerebrospinal fluid leakage compared with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion[J]. Eur Spine J, 2019, 28(2): 370-379.
[14] Bhalla A, Rolfe KW. Inadequate surgical decompression in patients with cervical myelopathy: a retrospective review[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(6): 542-547.
[15] Phan K, Scherman DB, Xu J, et al. Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(1): 94-103.
[16] Bhatia NN, Lopez G, Geck M, et al. Posterior cervical laminoplasty in the north American population: a minimum of two year follow-up[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 138: 165-168.
[17] Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, et al. Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(24): 2863-2870.
[18] Deora H, Kim SH, Behari S, et al. Anterior surgical techniques for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: WFNS spine committee recommendations[J]. Neurospine, 2019, 16(3): 408-420.
[19] Aliboye RM, Zoller SD, Ashana AA, et al. Regression of disc-osteophyte complexes following laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2017, 11(3): 129-137.
[20] Tang HM, Yeh KT, Lee RP, et al. Combined expansive open-door laminoplasty with short-segment lateral mass instrumented fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with short segment instability[J]. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2016, 28(1): 15-19.
[21] Kim GU, Lee GW. Selective blocking laminoplasty in cervical laminectomy and fusion to prevent postoperative C5 palsy[J]. Spine J, 2019, 19(4): 617-623.
[22] Su N, Fei Q, Wang B, et al. Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12: 1329-1337.
[23] Nori S, Shiraishi T, Aoyama R, et al. Muscle-preserving selective laminectomy maintained the compensatory mechanism of cervical lordosis after surgery[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(8): 542-549.
[24] Shiraishi T. Skip laminectom—a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report[J]. Spine J, 2002, 2(2): 108-115.
[25] Otani K, Iwabuchi M, Sato K, et al. Postoperative neck symptoms of posterior approach for cervical compressive myelopathy: expansive open-door laminoplasty vs. segmental partial laminectomy[J]. Fukushima J Med Sci, 2018, 64(2): 54-59
[26] Otani K, Sato K, Yabuki S, et al. A segmental partial laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anatomical basis and clinical outcome in comparison with expansive open-door laminoplasty[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(3): 268-273.
[27] Michael KW, Neustein TM, Rhee JM. Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis[J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(6): 737-741.
[28] Nori S, Aoyama R, Ninomiya K, et al. Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(9): 2393-2403.
[29] Kang KC, Suk KS, Kim HS, et al. Preoperative risk factors of C5 nerve root palsy after laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: analysis of 70 consecutive patients[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2017, 30(9): 419-424.
[30] Daniel JB, Adam MC, Charles ZS, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(1): 85-93.
[31] Rodriguez-Feo JA, Leas D, Odum SM, et al. Reoperation rates following open-door cervical laminoplasty[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2018, 12(6): 751-756..
[32] Vergara P, Timofeev I. Minimally invasive anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a valid alternative to open techniques[J]. Acta Neurochir(Wien), 2018, 160(12): 2467-2471.
[33] Kong WJ, Xin Z, Du Q, et al. Anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal decompression of the spinal cord for single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the technical interpretation and 2 years of clinical follow-up[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 461.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
通信作者: 郑启新 E-mail: zheng-qx@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-20