索引超出了数组界限。 文章摘要
|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]徐峰 袁凯旋 陈圣宝 张长青.髋关节功能评分研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志,2018,03:141-144.
点击复制

髋关节功能评分研究进展(PDF)

《国际骨科学杂志》[ISSN:1673-7083/CN:31-1952/R]

期数:
2018年03期
页码:
141-144
栏目:
综述
出版日期:
2018-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
-
作者:
徐峰 袁凯旋 陈圣宝 张长青
252000, 山东省聊城市东昌府人民医院骨外科(李若东); 252000, 山东省聊城监狱医院(张鹏); 252000, 山东省聊城市人民医院骨外科(赵北)
Author(s):
-
关键词:
髋关节;  功能评分;  量表;  Harris髋关节功能评分
Keywords:
-
分类号:
-
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-7083.2018.03.005
文献标识码:
-
摘要:
在评价髋部功能时,由于医生与患者的角度不同,存在多种记录和评价系统,包括Harris髋关节功能评分、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数量表、牛津髋关节量表等。这些评分系统均有一定的科学性和合理性,但由于髋部疾病种类繁多,髋关节解剖结构和功能活动复杂,评估的项目很难全面概括,至今国际上尚无统一的评分标准。该文介绍近年来使用较多的髋关节功能评分系统。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References


[1] Dawson J, Linsell L, Zondervan K, et al. Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults[J]. Rheumatology(Oxford), 2004, 43(4): 497-504.
[2] Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes A systematic review [J].J Rehabil Med, 2011, 43(7): 572-583.
[3] Kiraly E, Gondos T. The effect of functional movement ability on the quality of life after total hip replacement[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2014, 23(1/2): 124-131.
[4] Smith MV, Klein SE, Clohisy JC, et al. Lower extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(5): 468-477.
[5] 许伟华, 杨述华, 冯勇, 等. 多孔钽棒植入治疗股骨头坏死的适应证及临床疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节外科, 2010, 3(1): 28-32.
[6] Shi HY, Chang JK, Wong CY, et al. Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 261.
[7] Frihagen F, Grotle M, Madsen JE, et al. Outcome after femoral neck fractures: a comparison of Harris Hip Score, Eq-5d and Barthel Index[J]. Injury, 2008, 39(10): 1147-1156.
[8] Çelik D, Can C, Aslan Y, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Harris Hip Score[J]. Hip Int, 2014, 24(5): 473-479.
[9] Li Qiang,Luo X,Wang Z.Clinical trial of a method for postoperative assessment of hip arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop, 2001, 21(12): 721-725.
[10] Ritter MA, Albohm MJ. Overview:maintaining outcomes for total hip arthroplasty. The past, present, and future[J]. Clin Orthop, 1997,(344): 81-87.
[11] Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, et al. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2005, 6: 3.
[12] Wall PD, Hossain M, Beard DJ, et al. The effect of locomotion on the outcome following total hip arthroplasty[J]. Hip Int, 2013, 23(2): 193-198.
[13] 刘晖, 张育民, 姚建锋, 等. 两种评估方法在全髋关节置换术后的比较研究[J]. 中国骨与关节外科, 2011, 4(6): 450-454.
[14] Gordon M, Frumento P, Skoldenberg O, et al. Women in charnley class C fail to improve in mobility to a higher degree after total hip replacement[J]. Acta Orthop, 2014, 85(4): 335-341.
[15] Narkbunnam R, Amanatullah DF, Electricwala A, et al. Radiographic scoring system for the evaluation of stability of cementless acetabular components in the presence of osteolysis[J]. Bone Joint J, 2017, 99B(5): 601-606.
[16] Yao JJ, Kremers HM, Schleck CD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes can be used to streamline post-total hip arthroplasty follow-up to high-risk patients[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(11): 3319-3321.
[17] Singh JA, Schleck C, Harmsen WS. Validation of the Mayo hip score: construct validity, reliability and responsiveness to change[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17: 39.
[18] McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Rand JA, et al. Correlation of patient questionnaire responses and physician history in grading clinical outcome following hip and knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of 201 joint arthroplasties[J].J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11(1): 47-57.
[19] 戴尅戎, 董凡, 王以友, 等. 三种髋关节功能评定方法的比较研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 1994, 32(9): 535-538.
[20] 陈安民, 柯雯昙. 我国两种髋关节功能评定方法的临床比较研究[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 1998, 13(5): 259-261.
[21] Liebs TR, Herzberg W, Gluth J, et al. Using the patient's perspective to develop function short forms specific to total hip and knee replacement based on WOMAC function items[J]. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95B(2): 239-243.
[22] Konstantinidis GA, Aletras VH, Kanakari KA, et al. Comparative validation of the WOMAC osteoarthritis and Lequesne algofunctional indices in Greek patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis[J]. Qual Life Res, 2014, 23(2): 539-548.
[23] Rogers BA, Alolabi B, Carrothers AD, et al. Can the pre-operative Western Ontario and McMaster score predict patient satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty?[J]. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97B(2): 150-153.
[24] Ackerman IN, Tacey MA, Ademi Z, et al. Using WOMAC index scores and personal characteristics to estimate assessment of quality of life utility scores in people with hip and knee joint disease[J]. Qual Life Res, 2014, 23(8): 2365-2374.
[25] Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, et al. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: Ⅰ. development[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2000, 14(1): 20-25.
[26] Nourbakhsh M, Zarezadeh A, Shemshaki H, et al. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Oxford hip score for Iranian population[J]. Int J Prev Med, 2013, 4(2): 141-145.
[27] Tugay BU, Tugay N, Guney H, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of Oxford hip score[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(6): 879-889.
[28] Zheng W, Li J, Zhao J, et al. Development of a valid simplified Chinese version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(5): 1545-1551.
[29] Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set[J]. BMJ Open, 2015, 5(7): e007765.
[30] Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001, 83(8): 1125-1129.
[31] Uesugi Y, Makimoto K, Fujita K,et al.Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford hip score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2009, 14(1): 35-39.
[32] Gandek B, Ware JE. Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998, 51(11): 953-959.
[33] Zampelis V, Ornstein E, Franzen H, et al. A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty[J]. Acta Orthop, 2014, 85(2): 128-132.
[34] Honkavaara N, Al-Ani AN, Campenfeldt PA, et al. Good responsiveness with EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire and Short Form(36)Health Survey in 20-69 years old patients with a femoral neck fracture: a 2-year prospective follow-up study in 182 patients[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(8): 1692-1697.
[35] Rampazo-Lacativa MK, Santos AA, Coimbra AM, et al. WOMAC and SF-36: instruments for evaluating the health-related quality of life of elderly people with total hip arthroplasty. A descriptive study[J]. Sao Paulo Med J, 2015, 133(4): 290-297.
[36] Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2010, 44(16): 1186-1196.
[37] Scholtes VA, Terwee CB, Poolman RW. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable?[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(3): 236-240.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者单位: 252000, 山东省聊城市东昌府人民医院骨外科(李若东); 252000, 山东省聊城监狱医院(张鹏); 252000, 山东省聊城市人民医院骨外科(赵北) 通信作者: 赵北 E-mail: zhaoyibei2004@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-20